Quick and messy sketch




Trying out new Photoshop brush settings (mainly low flow percentage)

Two January sketches

Girl in Jacket sketch by Justine LavoieSword suit by Justine Lavoie

Educate and Inspire Yourself

RSS Feed IconI’m recently become that person who likes to be kept up to date on things. This urge probably started when I began listening to NPR during my commute, and now it’s creeping over to topics other than geopolitical news. I’ve tried “keeping up” with certain people and sites that interested and inspired me, but sometimes it’s hard to tell when new content has been published. There’s also the problem of distraction (mostly a good thing). Still, if I only have a limited amount of time per day to engage in this particular type of aggressive knowledge acquisition, I’ll need to make sure I’m focusing on the topics I really want to be focused on.

RSS Feeds are my solution to staying focused and up to date in a variety of categories. I currently use Google Reader as my reader, but there are many different readers to choose from. One interesting thing about Google Reader is the ability to subscribe to “bundles” of feeds. There are literally hundreds of different categories to choose from, including (all of which I’m currently subscribed) Art, Feminism, Science, Technology, Web, UX, and pretty much anything you can think of (though I was surprised not to find any feed related to sexuality). You can also create your own bundles, which I did for a general ‘Design’ feed that you can subscribe to here. it has a mix of education and inspiration relevant to logo design, graphic design, illustration, and web design.

Art inspired by The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

Sketch of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo - Lisbeth Salander

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo - Lisbeth Salander sketch




Watched the American remake of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo this weekend and got inspired. Lisbeth is one of my favorite characters in anything ever. The American version was good, but I think I prefer the Swedish version more.

Getting around to it

Crowne - Underpainting


Finally getting around to finishing this.

Understanding Music Copyright and the Public Domain

I wanted to let my thoughts stew for a week before I wrote anything about my first task, Understanding Music Copyright and the Public Domain, in the p2pu Classical Music study group. So here we go!

Before now, I’ve never really done too much research into intellectual property law or the public domain, so the specifics are all pretty new to me. As an artist I had a basic understanding of copyright law, and in the case of my art I’m very restrictive about it’s use. On my deviantart page, for example, I watermark all of my work because I don’t want people to take it and put it elsewhere without my permission. deviantart is actually pretty progressive in that it allows users who submit art to attribute different types of creative commons licenses to their work if they so choose. I think that’s how I first got exposed to the creative commons and thinking about copyright and licensing.

For a copyright/cc/public domain beginner, I’d recommend reading this part of a FAQ on the Creative Commons website. The Creative Commons licensing page also has a nice video that explains the licenses themselves. This is a general overview of how it all works, but for music things are a little different. I think PD info has a pretty good FAQ that sums up how it works and gives some important dates. One thing to note (which I didn’t realize and feel silly for now), is that all of the research I’m doing applies to the USA only! I’d be interested to hear about how other countries’ copyright and public domain music laws work.

There’s also free music, “which is either in the public domain or licensed under a free license by the artist or copyright holder themselves, often as a method of promotion.” Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails has released two of his albums under a Creative Commons license (BY-NC-SA), which was very interesting to me. Open music, a subset of free music, is the concept of “open source” applied to music, and seems to be more permissive of derivative works and collaboration.

From my research, it seems like everything I want to listen to has a composition in the public domain, but very few of them have a recording in the public domain. So what do we do? Well, there are a few resources. I think the immediate response is to try to search youtube, and while this will probably be the quickest and easiest way to find something, there’s a catch. Since youtube has a duration limit for its videos and because there are usually a number of movements in each piece, the youtube listening experience isn’t as good as having the full-length album or sound files. Still, it may be our only way to find certain pieces and it a good fallback resource.

As far as searching the internet, Wikipedia:Sound/list is a very good place to start, especially for older classical pieces. The Internet Archive is pretty good too. I got good results from searching like this: “(collection:opensource_audio OR mediatype:opensource_audio) AND -mediatype:collection AND classical”. Musopen is a non-profit that have a large database of free classical music to listen to as well. I’m pretty sure our public libraries will have a good selection, too. I’ll be going some time this week to test that theory.

Knifefight


Learn about classical music

Listen and write about classical music to gain a better understanding and appreciation of it

This collaborative study group is meant for anyone who wants to know more about classical music. We will participate in three ways:

Read about the history of classical music, composers, instruments, and etc.

Listen to classical pieces.

Write about your reactions and thoughts to the piece you listened to and share these ideas for continued discussion.

Interested? Join the study group

Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary 11/11/11


Please explain technophobia

I’d really like to avoid starting this artificial intelligence post with mentioning Watson. Oops, too late. You’ve probably heard about Watson, the IBM computer that plays Jeopardy. Hopefully you also know that Watson’s Jeopardy prowess isn’t really what’s important here. I get nervous when I think about those people who doesn’t appreciate or understand the importance of a computer learning to parse questions given in a natural language. So it worries when I see articles like this on NPR. This isn’t the first time NPR has released a negatively biased segment about artificial intelligence. I’m actually kind of disgusted, and I haven’t even read the comments yet.

Using the nation’s volatile fear and worry about our current employment situation as a way to stir up hostility toward scientific advancement just really bothers me. I think the use of the word “machine” is particularly interesting here. It’s very negative-sounding, but why? Our prestigious bank teller and airline check-in agent positions are the epitome of meaningful and need to be protected, right?. I think Iain Banks sums it up pretty nicely in this interview with CNN.

CNN: In the Culture’s post-scarcity society, where no one needs for anything, you’re removing a lot of the struggle around everyday life. Is that not removing the point of life itself?

Iain M. Banks: I think a lot of the struggle is kind of pointless and is in itself boring. The struggle for existence for most people most of the time, especially in a post-agricultural, industrial society, is a bit of a grind. People have to work very hard and awfully long hours for not a great deal of money: if you don’t, you get virtually nothing. Life’s not much fun, frankly, so I’d quite happily trade in that struggle.